RELIGIOSITY LEARNING AND STUDENTS’ ASSESSMENT IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION (IRE)
Abstract
Abstrak. Pendidikan Agama Islam adalah bimbingan jasmani dan rohani berdasarkan hukum agama Islam menuju terbentuknya kepribadian yang sesuai dengan kerangka Islam. Dari segi ini, tampak bahwa ada dua dimensi yang akan diwujudkan, yaitu dimensi transendental dan sekuler. Perilaku agama atau religiusitas harus dapat memenuhi kebutuhan dasar, yaitu kebutuhan untuk memenuhi tujuan agama yang berkontribusi pada kehidupan religius. Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) harus ditangani secara profesional dan proporsional. Ini berarti bahwa evaluasi harus dijalankan dengan cara memberikan solusi ke arah hasil yang baik dari proses belajar.
Â
Kata kunci: Â learning, students assessment, Islamic Religious Education
Downloads
References
Airasian, P.W., Classroom assessment. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1991.
Biggs, J., Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press, 1999.
Braskamp, L. and Ory, J., Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing individual and institutional Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
Brookhart, Susan M., Portfolio Assessment. 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook, ed. by Thomas L. Good, Sage Publication, 2008
Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F., Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. In A.W.Chickering and Z.F.Gamson (eds.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No.47. Michigan: Jossey-Bass Inc, 1991.
Davis, B. G., Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1993.
Depdiknas, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasionak, Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, 2003.
Ellington, H.E,. Shirley & Cowan, J. Making Effective Use of Peer and Self Assessment. http://aou.gcal.ac. uk/ciced/Ch26. html (1997).
Eileen Lewis and Elaine Seymour, Classroom Assessment Techniques Attitude Surveys. http://www.flaguide.org /cat/attitude/attitude6.php
Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fortier, J., The Wisconsin Road Test as an empirical example of a large-scale, high-stakes, authentic performance assessment. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 1993.
Frederiksen, N.. "The Real Test Bias: Influences of Testing on Teaching and Learning". American Psychologist, 39 (1984). p. 193–202.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Perceptions of Authentic Assessment: Five Dimensions of Authenticity. Paper presented at the Second Biannual Joint Northumbria/European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction SIG Assessment Conference, Bergen, Norway. Retrieved December 7, 2008, from: http://www.ou.nl/Docs/Expertise/OTEC/ Publicaties/ judith%20gullikers/paper%20SIG%202004%20Bergen.pdf
Glock and Stark, Religion and Society in Transition, Chicago: Rand Mc Nally, 1965.
Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic Assessment and Multimedia: How University Students Respond to a Model of Authentic Assessment (Electronic version). Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 305-322. Retrieved November 6, 2008, from: http://edserver2.uow. edu.au/~janh/assessment/authentic%20assessment_files/herdsa.pdf
Hibbard, K. M. and others. A teacher's guide to performance-based learning and assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1996.
Ingham, Joanne, Meeting the Challenges of an Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum." Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education, Greenwood, 2000.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Johnson-Holubec, E.. Circles of Learning – Cooperation in the Classroom. 3rd ed. Edina, Min.: Interaction Book Co., 1990.
Kirszner, Laurie G. and Mandell, Stephen R, The Brief Wadsworth Handbook, 7th ed. Wadsworth, 2012.
Meyer, C. “What's the difference between authentic and performance assessment?†in Education Leadership, 49 (8), (1992), p. 39–40.
Noonan, B. & Duncan, C. R. Peer and Self-Assessment in High Schools, Practical; Assessment, Research & Evaluation. A Peer-Reviewed Electronic Journal, (10), 17 (2005).
Piaget, J. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge. 1950.
Sanders, James R. Dkk, The Program Evaluation Standards 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, California : Sage Publication, Inc. 1994.
Sims, G. K., Student peer review in the classroom: a teaching and grading tool, J. Agron. Educ. 8 (2), (1989), p. 105-108.
Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F & Moerkerke, G. Creating A Learning Encironment by using Self-, Peer- and Co-Assessment. (1998). http://www.extranet.ou.nl/inter-studie-alg-o31411/ Symposium3/materiaal/bronnenmateriaal/Sluijsmansea.pdf
Stiggins, R. J. Student-centered classroom assessment. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1994.
Sundstrom, A., Self Assessment of Knowledge and Abilities: A Literature Study, EM (54) (2005).
Taylor, P.A. dan Cowley, D.M. (ed.) Reading in Curriculum Evaluation. Dubuque, Iowa : Brown, 1972.
Vygotsky, L. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1978.
Wiggins, G., A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, (May, 1989), p. 703-713.
Weeden, P. Winter, J. & Broadfoot, P., Assessment: Whats in it for School?, New York: Routledge Falmer, 2002.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.